|
You probably can't point to a single moment when things changed. There was no formal warning, no difficult conversation, no clear line in the sand. But something is different. The work that used to come your way isn't. The meetings you used to be in are happening without you. The feedback has gotten sharper, and more frequent, and harder to brush off. That feeling has a name. It's called quiet firing or being managed out — and it's more common than most people realize. Being managed out is when a manager tries to nudge an employee toward the exit without actually firing them. No formal termination, no severance conversation. Just a slow erosion of responsibilities, visibility, and standing until leaving starts to feel like the employee's own idea. It happens because formal firings are legally complicated, or because a manager lacks the courage to have a direct conversation. Either way, the effect on the employee is the same. Three signs tend to show up consistently. Shrinking responsibilities — a project you owned is now something you merely assist with, and nothing new has replaced it. Being cut out of communication — decisions are being made without you, meetings are happening without you, and you're hearing things from colleagues before your manager tells you. And a sudden spike in criticism — which often signals what researchers call "set-up-to-fail syndrome," a cycle where increased oversight creates anxiety, anxiety creates more mistakes, and more mistakes justify more oversight. Once you're in that loop, it's hard to break without intervention. The response starts with a direct, low-threat conversation. In your next one-on-one, ask your manager: How would you define success in my role right now, and how are you measuring it? That question signals engagement, invites honesty, and gives you real information to work from instead of just a vibe. From there, it's worth assessing whether the situation is about your performance or about something bigger — restructuring, budget shifts, a new leader with a new agenda. The answer to that question is the fork in the road. It determines whether your energy goes toward turning things around internally, or toward preparing for what comes next. If you're staying, invest in internal allies — colleagues who know your work and will advocate for you when you're not in the room. If you're leaving, invest in your external network — former colleagues, old contacts, people you haven't talked to in a while but who know you well enough to help. Research consistently shows these "weak ties" are the most valuable when it comes to finding new roles. And in either case, use the time you have now: update your resume, save your best work somewhere you'll have access to it, and understand your legal rights before you need them. Being managed out isn't a verdict on your ability. In most cases, it's about fit — the wrong organization, the wrong moment, or the wrong manager. The next opportunity is closer than it feels. If you want to walk through all five steps in more depth — including the self-assessment that most people skip — I put it all together in this week's video.
Here's some more resources I recommend: Trust Isn't Built. It's Reciprocated: Most leaders treat trust like a savings account — deposit enough consistency over time and eventually the team opens up. But that's not how it works. Trust isn't earned. It's reciprocated. There's a loop running in every team interaction, and it either closes or it breaks in the seconds after someone takes an interpersonal risk. Most leaders never realize they're the ones breaking it. In this keynote clip I introduce the concept of "The Trust Loop" and explain why psychological safety isn't an HR initiative — it's the direct result of what happens in that moment. Once you see it, you can't unsee it. Click here to watch. Change Is Hard. Falling Behind Is Harder. Most teams don't fail at change because of bad strategy — they fail because no one addressed the human side of it. The emotional disruption, the blurred roles, the communication that breaks down exactly when it needs to work. That's where teams lose ground. In my LinkedIn Learning course, I walk through the practical side of navigating change as a team: how to build a shared vision, clarify roles, and design communication norms that actually hold under pressure. Whether you manage a team or contribute to one, the frameworks here apply immediately. Check it out here.
|
Join 25,000 other leaders who receive my twice monthly tips on building high-performing teams.
You've probably got a dashboard somewhere that says things are fine. Few problems reported, most metrics green. Here's an uncomfortable thought: that might not mean you have few problems. It might mean you have a team that learned not to report them. That's the real lesson buried inside one of the most famous business turnarounds of the last twenty years—and it's not the one that gets taught. In December 2009, Domino's did something almost no company ever does. They bought national TV time to...
You know the type. They announce a bold new priority in the all-hands meeting with zero warning. Two weeks later, it's a completely different priority. They run on urgency, change, and a little chaos — sometimes a lot of it. When you were an individual contributor, that kind of leader was mostly a problem for happy hour. Once you became a manager, their chaos became your job. You're now the buffer between the noise at the top and the people counting on you to help them do good work — whether...
Most advice on managing teams assumes everyone works for you full-time, in the same building, on the same schedule. That assumption hasn't been true for years. Your team probably includes a freelance designer juggling two other clients, a fractional product manager who vanishes after Monday's standup, or a part-time engineer with more experience than half your full-time staff. Leading a team like this isn't just "regular management, but smaller." The rules actually change. Here's the core...